DennisLeeWilson
2017-October-24 12:40:50 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Click here for my public PGP key   Google Translate   Wikipedia Comparison of Language Translator programs   I use Firefox browser & add-on called "Google Translator for Firefox"
“I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.” ~Thomas Jefferson
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge has its limitations, while imagination has no limits.” ~Albert Einstein
I love Arizona, I loathe its intrusive governments, especially the City of Phoenix.



“The 'Greatest Generation' is the one that ABOLISHED the USA military draft.”
~Dennis Wilson, Arizona writer

Brainstorming!! Give it a try!   Subject Index to my Published Articles
Creative Commons vs Copyright Notice  Disclaimer


Donations? Hell, NO!*

Because robo-spammers outnumber real people by 20 to 1, you MUST register to post AND your membership MUST be approved.
SEND EMAIL with YOUR comments or a posting to Admin (at) DennisLeeWilson.com to prove that you are NOT an automaton.
Sure. It is a bother. But you only have to do it once to become a member. And you don't have to wade thru the spam.
 
   Home   Help Search Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [2007-04-08.2] “DDT Ban & Malaria: An Unnecessary Tragedy, INDEED!”  (Read 20978 times)
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« on: 2008-November-27 03:41:19 PM »

[2007-04-08.2] “DDT Ban & Malaria: An Unnecessary Tragedy, INDEED!”
http://tinyurl.com/DDT-vs-Malaria
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg82#msg82
  • An article questioning the wasted and misguided efforts of the (Bill & Melinda) Gates Foundation and the complete blackout of the role of DDT in eradicating malaria.
  • The government ban on DDT has caused MORE HUMAN DEATHS since 1970 than ALL the government wars and genocides since the beginning of the 20th Century--and the deaths still continue EVERY DAY! Malaria kills 800,000 children per year, thanks to Government bans on DDT in the 1970s!

http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2007/tle412-20070408-04.html
 
THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
Number 412, April 8, 2007
"We are a part of the natural world"

DDT Ban & Malaria: An Unnecessary Tragedy, INDEED!
by Dennis Lee Wilson
DennisLeeWilson@Yahoo.com


Special to The Libertarian Enterprise

In the Feb 2007 issue of the Iowa Alumni Magazine, I read with interest Carol Harker's article "An Unnecessary Tragedy"[1]. The interesting part was the complete blackout of the role of DDT in eradicating malaria. DDT is not mentioned even once in the article and neither is the fact that politicians, not scientists, are the people who have banned its use.

In 1948, Dr. Paul H. Muller of Switzerland was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine because of the medical importance of DDT. In Sri Lanka in 1948, before using DDT, there were 2.8 million cases of malaria. By 1963, because of the use of DDT, there were ONLY 17 (SEVENTEEN) CASES OF MALARIA!! DDT has never harmed a single human being. Humans can and have eaten DDT with no ill effects. But politicians, in spite of empirical and scientific proof of its safety and benefits, banned it in the mid 1960s. By 1969, cases in Sri Lanka reach 2.5 million again.

Six years after DDT was banned, there were 800 million cases in the world and 8.2 million deaths. Now, there are an estimated 300-500 million new cases of malaria each year, resulting in more than a million deaths annually (90% in children in Africa). According to Harker's article: "Every day of every year, some 3,000 children die from malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. That's one child every 30 seconds. ... even if they live, many victims of malaria suffer lasting consequences, including anemia, seizures, spasticity, blindness, brain damage, speech impediments, and difficulty learning."

Instead of preventing malaria BEFORE it happens (DDT accomplished that--apparently TOO well), the focus has shifted to treating malaria AFTER it happens. After all, why would foundations grant money to something that is not a problem. It must take quite an effort to keep someone like Bill Gates, who has access to global internet resources, from learning about the amazing history of DDT and the near eradication of worldwide malaria. [For new insight on Bill Gates and what he knows, see articles following this one...Dennis, 2012-Feb]

From the article:

  • "Since they created the Gates Foundation in 1998, Microsoft founder Bill Gates and his wife, Melinda French Gates, have earmarked hundreds of millions of dollars to develop children's vaccines, including vaccines to prevent malaria."

    "It might be some years before a vaccine is ready, but new interest in beating an ancient disease has prompted governments and business, private foundations and worldwide organizations, churches and individuals to coordinate efforts to minimize the damage that malaria causes. Thousands of people from the WHO, UNICEF, the Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, and many other groups have taken up the cause."


An Unnecessary Tragedy, INDEED! And it continues because otherwise intelligent people will not call for the removal of the ban on DDT. They prefer monetary grants to real solutions. Allowing DDT to be used would really upset their grants.

Instead of trying to "squelch the suffering it causes", which is part of the subtitle and a major focus of Harker's article, what is so wrong with actual ERADICATION of the CAUSE of the disease? How does one measure human suffering? Is it easier to comfort and treat 17 cases or 800 million cases? Or perhaps I should "Ask The Right Question"[3]: How much grant money can be had for 17 cases of malaria versus 800 million cases?

The following quote from Harker's article comes very close to the historical truth, but fails to mention the role of politicians in banning the one successful pesticide: DDT.

  • "Today, about 40 percent of the world's population is at risk from contracting malaria—up from 10 percent in the early 1960s. Why the big increase? Malaria vectors—the mosquitoes that carry the parasite—have been remarkably adept at developing resistance to pesticides, and malaria parasites themselves have developed increased resistance to a growing number of drugs used to treat the disease."


The truth is that there was NO resistance developed to DDT—at least not by insects. However, politicians are remarkably adept at developing resistance to truth and to the suffering of the HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of new malaria victims created by political bans on the use of DDT.

Harker's article has a side column featuring Regina Rabinovich. She writes:

  • "Pharmaceutical and biotech companies have little incentive to develop products against malaria, a classic example of market failure. This is tragic in the light of findings that the development of a preventive vaccine is technically feasible."


She completely ignores the historic role of DDT's near eradication of malaria, and her statement itself is an example of the failure of the politically motivated and government funded education system, not of the free market where she attempts to place the blame. Instead it is "a classic example of" political meddling in a free market—and at a horrendous cost in human lives which even exceeds that of wars between governments during the 20th Century. When considering the number of human deaths involved, her blackout of the role of DDT is obscene. I am amazed at the amount of money that is being "granted" to ignore a proven preventative and to "defeat" a disease that was once almost eradicated—proof again of the power of grant seekers.

  • Rachel Carson's fable about the alleged dangers of pesticides, the 1962 book, Silent Spring, became a classic of the environmental movement despite the fact that it was a work of fiction. The book had a powerful influence, however, and governments throughout the world banned DDT and other pesticides beginning in the early 1970s. This ban has led to the death of literally millions of people in the Third World from malaria. It has also caused numerous crop disasters as voracious insects that were once killed off with DDT are no longer, and substitutes are often unaffordable in Third World countries.

    In 1970, shortly before DDT was banned, the National Academy of Sciences determined that DDT had saved 500 million lives over the previous three decades by eradicating malaria-carrying mosquitoes. DDT was banned by the U.S. government in the early 1970s despite the fact that no science was presented that it had the effects that Carson and the environmental movement claimed it had.

    Even if the National Academy of Sciences estimate of lives saved by DDT is off by a multiple of two, Rachel Carson and her crusade against the pesticide would still be responsible for more human deaths than most of the worst tyrants in world history. [4]


Countless writers and scientific researchers have pointed out the high costs—especially in human lives—and low benefits of environmental laws and regulations. Yet, we see once again that applied environmentalism can be disastrous. Environmentalism has become a sacrosanct religion of which no questions can even be asked. Harker's article is an excellent example of just how sacrosanct environmentalism has become. DDT has been eradicated from their version of history and from their minds.

We are talking about the lives of MILLIONS of people who have DIED of malaria following the banning of DDT, a preventative which had once—during my lifetime—almost eradicated the "scourge that has hounded man since the beginning of time."

"Death by environmentalism! The verdict is in; environmentalism is not only hazardous to our health, it threatens our very lives."[2] But of course, if using DDT solved the malaria problem, then there would be no need to keep a bunch of politicians and their friends well stocked with grant money looking for solutions to problems that have already been solved.

In other words, "The truth be damned, we don't care about the number of human deaths, just give us the grant money! Its for the chiiiiildren."


Notes

[1] "An Unnecessary Tragedy" by Carol Harker, The Iowa Alumni Magazine, 2007-February
http://www.iowalum.com/magazine/feb07/exclusive/malaria.html
Any comments about this article, e-mail Carol Harker at carol-harker@uiowa.edu
Apparently this article has been removed from the IowaAlum website, so I have reproduced it here:
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=467.msg867#msg867

[2] "Death by Environmentalism" by William L. Anderson
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.asp?control=1269

[3] My article "Ask the Right Question" The Libertarian Enterprise Number 367, May 14, 2006,
http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2006/tle367-20060514-03.html
Extended version posted at my site:
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=12.msg41#msg41

[4] "Two Very Fashionable Frauds" by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?Id=1655



Dennis Wilson graduated from the University of Iowa in 1961 with a Bachelor of Arts in General Science.
He is a lapsed member of Mensa and past editor of Vidya, the Journal of the Triple Nine Society


Creative Commons

Attribution Share Alike

« Last Edit: 2014-August-25 11:59:48 PM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: 2010-September-16 01:05:12 PM »



Malaria: "An Unnecessary Tragedy" by Carol Harker-State Univ of Iowa
Apparently this article has been removed from the IowaAlum website, so I have reproduced it here:
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=467.msg867#msg867
« Last Edit: 2014-February-08 03:19:39 PM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
jeeze
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


« Reply #2 on: 2011-February-17 01:37:56 PM »

Definitely a new spin on what I've heard before but something to think about. Thank you.
Logged

www.directsattv.com site upkeep director
AtlasAikido
AtlasAikido
Sr. Member
***
Posts: 288


« Reply #3 on: 2012-January-29 03:03:00 PM »

Found this article regarding The Decivilizing Effects of Government
Mises Daily: Thursday, September 23, 2010 by Jeffrey A. Tucker

The Return of Bedbugs

This is an exceedingly dangerous trend in government policy. Our country is currently suffering one of the consequences.

There was a rhyme that was common in the 1920s that went: "Sleep tight. Don't let the bedbugs bite." Generations have thought of it as a quaint saying that has nothing to do with reality.

In fact, bedbugs were almost completely wiped out all over the planet by the 1950s, due to modern, life-saving chemicals like DDT, a chemical invented by scientist Paul Hermann Müller working for a private Swiss company (Novartis) that has been widely smeared but has saved hundreds of millions of lives. Its banning in the early 1970s, under the influence of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, has been blamed for a global calamity.

Thanks in part to this ban, malaria today kills between one and three million people per year. This is shocking but it is not entirely unusual in the sweep of history. It is easy to regard insects as the most dangerous evil on this earth, having killed far more people than gulags, gas chambers, and even nuclear weapons.

In fact, insects are the only things on this earth that have been more dangerous to human welfare than governments — and that's really saying something. In the 14th century, disease-carrying insects killed off as much as 60% of Europe's population. The United States has had its own serious issues with yellow fever. We don't think about this, but this is because we don't have the black death right now, due mainly to the achievements of capitalism.

Today we are living with a return of bedbugs on an epidemic level. The National Pest Management Association says that nearly all pest-management companies say that they have seen thousands of new bedbug reports from all over the country. There is even a website that tracks this: bedbugregistry.com. This epidemic, which is so bad that even the New York Times published an alarmed editorial, is directly related to the banning of chemicals that had had bedbugs under control.

There are other chemicals besides DDT that control bedbugs such as propoxur, but in 2007 the EPA banned it for indoor use. Now any pest-management company that uses it indoors is threatened with fines and, potentially, with jail. It's so bad that the Ohio Department of Agriculture has begged the EPA for a change in policy, but the EPA won't budge. Instead, it advises people to "reduce clutter in your home to reduce hiding places for bed bugs" and also suggests "eliminating bed bug habitats." Oh, and of course the EPA strongly suggests that you work on "raising awareness through education."

The New York Times had a headline story on how the return of bedbugs has baffled scientists. Later in the article, however, the text says that chemicals can control them, but that all those chemicals are currently banned. Well, if the answer is before us but we are forbidden by government to use that answer, or retailers and exterminators are too intimidated by the threatening political culture to take the risk, I don't see that there is much reason to be baffled by the problem. What is it about cause and effect that these people do not understand?

Now, I don't want to get into a dispute about chemicals and their effects. Some people say that DDT is no longer effective — but black-market DDT is still a vibrant industry — and that there are downsides to propoxur or that there are other natural and chemical agents that are effective. I'm not a scientist and I have no opinion on which views are correct here. Opinions are all over the map on these questions.

My point is simply this: the market process that would normally allow innovation, trial and error, and the accumulation and implementation of all available scientific knowledge has been subverted by government institutions that have presumed to know what is best, thereby centrally planning the use of chemicals to control pests. Even to bring a new chemical to market requires seven years and some $100 million just to jump through the regulatory thicket, which has a bias against progress, capitalism, and innovation. We end up having to trust experts and competing scientific claims based on rarefied results from tests rather than markets.
Logged
AtlasAikido
AtlasAikido
Sr. Member
***
Posts: 288


« Reply #4 on: 2012-January-29 03:19:19 PM »

~DDT was banned according to https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/DDT

"The book's publication[--Rachel Carson's Silent Spring--] was one of the signature events in the birth of the environmental movement, and resulted in a large public outcry that eventually led to DDT being banned in the US in 1972. DDT was subsequently banned for *agricultural use worldwide* under the Stockholm Convention, but its limited use in disease vector control continues to this day..."

~Spraying isolated areas does not cut it!

Laws banning widespread spraying is hardly the same as widespread spraying. It is not hard to figure out that limited spraying (vector control) allows unaffected mosquitoes to swarm in. Duh!

~DDT was limited and its use curtailed for unscientific reasons (as it relates to Resistance and Safety)

[Alleged] Resistance and the harm both to humans and the environment led many governments to restrict or curtail the use of DDT [even] in vector control *as well as agriculture*. Obviously Vector control is not working for mosquito borne malaria as malaria has increased enormously since the 1970 ban.

Vs

~Scientifically proven safety and efficacy of DDT.

In 1948, Dr. Paul H. Muller of Switzerland was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine because of the medical importance of DDT. In Sri Lanka in 1948, before using DDT, there were 2.8 million cases of malaria. By 1963, because of the widespread spraying usage of DDT, there were ONLY 17 (SEVENTEEN) CASES OF MALARIA!! DDT has never harmed a single human being. *Humans can and have eaten DDT with no ill effects*. But politicians, in spite of empirical and scientific proof of its safety and benefits*, banned it in the mid 1960s. By 1969, cases in Sri Lanka reach 2.5 million again.

~Wide spread spraying works!

Of what good is "vector" control when a person walks out of the controlled area and into or thru an agricultural / city area where malaria mosquitoes thrive? Simple physics say that the vector control area was overwhelmed by the surrounding untreated agricultural area. If I put my fist in a bucket of water then pull it out, how big is the hole, and how long does it last?

~How important is a human life?

It makes sense to hold fast to the scientific method and the free market. That an evidenced troll is lecturing that banning and limited usage (vector control) instituted by Government citing Rachel Carson's Silent Spring IS the same as the documented actual solution--widespread spraying of DDT AND its proven safety to human--tells me that it knows little of this issue nor science other than to obfuscate the obvious. Which it has been doing since it arrived at a site I was posting on.
« Last Edit: 2012-January-31 10:54:47 PM by AtlasAikido » Logged
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: 2012-February-01 07:56:31 PM »

Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1250#msg1250

This might explain why Bill and Melinda Gates are against saving 800,000 kids a year using DDT...

http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html

Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population

Friday, October 01, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)   
   
   
(NaturalNews) In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for People) -- might be reduced. He says:

  • "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

You can watch this yourself at:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
The same video without "Flash" requirement is at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gROhNaJoGzI

Reducing the world population through vaccines

This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"

Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it helps.

Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help almost no one from a scientific point of view (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_junk_science.html), it raises the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the first place?

Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. Once again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723

How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?

Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't be very effective.

And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.

Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population:

#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.

#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages (http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).

#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic. Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.

This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study documenting this was published in PLoS. Read the story here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_seasonal_flu_shot_vaccines.html

Here's the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus? PLoS Med 7(4): e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259

The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15 percent, as Bill Gates suggested).

Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all in the name of health care!

The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the "hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting people all over the world. One such program is researching the development of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use specially-coated nano-materials to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.

More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration" solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)

It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.

Who will be left alive? The smart people

The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.

I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!" (Their words, not mine.)

In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious we are not alone in the universe.

If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it may be precisely what they are thinking.

In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates you don't believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you even from mild infections.

Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any government care about protecting your health, either?

As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people" then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)

As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what we've discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people increases the death rate of the population.

My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.

Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question what they're being told to do by their own corrupt governments.
« Last Edit: 2014-September-17 09:03:30 PM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: 2012-February-15 10:53:58 AM »

Microsoft buys eugenics technology from Merck
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1253#msg1253

While reading the previous and next articles, keep in mind that--instead of diabolically KILLING other human beings or UNILATERALLY ruining their reproductive genes, their lives and their futures--the money and effort COULD have been spent on many PRODUCTIVE, USEFUL things. Here are a few that come to my mind:

  • Getting man into space--privately. In space, there is NO "over-population problem"--real or concocted.
  • Funding telomeres research to EXTEND human life, instead of shorting it with eugenics.
  • Curing cancer and other diseases (eliminating malaria HAS ALREADY BEEN DEMONSTRATED using DDT)
  • Electric and hydrogen fueled cars
  • Cheap solar panels for individual homes
  • Low cost energy beamed from satellites
  • Low cost, world wide, wireless energy distribution, such as Tesla demonstrated 100 years ago
  • Low cost, world wide, wireless Wifi internet access
  • Conversion of Uranium power plants to the much safer THORIUM!
  • ...
  • Making MS Windows stable!! Hell, Gates cannot even keep computer viruses out of his own product. Why is he mucking around with real viruses?

What has Bill Gates done instead? He deliberately ignores the proven DDT solution. He has funded fake vaccine "research" on malaria. While his fake research stumbles along, year after year, the BAN on DDT continues to record deaths of more than 800,000 children per year. And NOW he is going to use the mosquitoes that he has saved from DDT to infect the rest of us with his genetic experiments.

Where have we encountered this kind of grotesque thinking before?

Mild mannered Bill Gates really IS a monster!


Dennis



http://www.naturalnews.com/034848_Microsoft_Merck_eugenics.html

Microsoft buys eugenics technology from Merck

Becomes drug development partner with top global vaccine manufacturer

Mike Adams
Natural News

Thursday, February 2, 2012

When you buy Microsoft products, you are now promoting the pharmaceutical industry and its global vaccine agenda. That’s the new reality in which we live, where the world’s largest software company is “in bed” with the world’s largest vaccine pusher.

How so? In 2009, Microsoft purchased a key piece of technology from the drug company Merck, the world’s largest maker of vaccines (which Bill Gates says can help “reduce the global population” by 10 to 15 percent). That technology, as you’ll see below, can conceivably be used to develop eugenics vaccines that target specific races and nationalities with infertility-inducing pharmaceuticals — something that is entirely consistent with Bill Gates’ openly-admitted goal of reducing world population through the use of vaccines (link to video--> http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723).

This gene-targeting vaccine research technology purchased by Microsoft was developed by the company known as Rosetta Biosciences, formerly owned by Merck. Their software is described as a way to “figure out how genes interact with each other, analyze peptides and metabolites, and determine how they relate to gene expression.” (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2009288622_rosetta020.html)

An announcement on the Rosetta Biosoftware web site explains, “The deal allows Microsoft to incorporate genetic, genomic, metabolomic and proteomics data management software into the Microsoft Amalga Life Sciences platform for enhanced translational research capabilities.” (http://www.rosettabio.com/company/news/rosetta_microsoft)

This same announcement goes on to say that vaccine maker Merck will “provide strategic input to Microsoft” as a part of the deal. Merck’s strategy, of course, is to make money by pimping vaccines and pharmaceuticals, including the now-infamous Gardasil vaccine.

Rupert Vessey, the vice president of Merck Research Laboratories, openly admits this deal puts Microsoft in the role of being a drug developer. He says, “We look forward to collaborating with Microsoft to develop new bioinformatic solutions to enable and expedite drug discovery and development…”

This is a key statement to understand, because the term “bioinformatic” can only mean one thing. What stores information in biology? These is only one digital storage system in human biology, and that system is, of course, DNA. Therefore, the idea of developing “bioinformatic solutions” really means to develop “gene-targeting drugs and vaccines.”

This is fully consistent with Bill Gates’ admitted agenda of reducing world population with the help of drug company technologies. At a TED conference, he announced in front of a live audience:“…if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower [global population] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”(http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)

See the video yourself at:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723

All this comes on the heels of other recent news that Bill Gates is funding sperm-destroying technology to cause widespread male infertility (http://www.naturalnews.com/034834_Bill_Gates_sperm_infertility.html).

His foundation has also funded genetically modified mosquitoes and other mad science experiments (http://www.naturalnews.com/030940_Bill_Gates_Foundation_genetics.html).  [NOW we know why there is no interest in using that proven malaria control, DDT...Dennis]

Microsoft the new leader in eugenics technology?

What’s clear from all this is that Bill Gates is pursuing an agenda of human depopulation. This is a similar agenda of those who pursue eugenics efforts around the globe, including Adolf Hitler and a long list of former FDA Commissioners in the United States. One of the most common ambitions of those in the highest positions of power, it seems, is to cull the human population and eliminate “the little people,” leaving only a “master race” of supreme beings.

Even major universities around the globe are now teaching students that human beings are evil for merely being alive and exhaling carbon dioxide, and that killing off humans is “green” for the planet.

In order to kill off large swaths of human beings, the most efficient mechanism to use is a self-replicating, gene-targeted bioweapon. Microsoft’s Amalga Life Sciences technology, purchased from vaccine developer Merck, theoretically provides a viable platform to develop precisely such bioweapons. It is interesting that no announcements from the company appear to have been made since being acquired by Microsoft in 2009, indicating that their work is now being conducted in total secrecy, behind closed doors.

U.S. government admits developing weaponized, deadly flu strains

Recent headlines reveal that the United States government has also secretly funded bioweapons research that resulted in the development of super-deadly flu strains that could wipe out far more than just 15 percent of the human population. As revealed in recent news headlines:


That may be precisely the point, it turns out. There is no better way to promote the vaccine profits of the pharmaceutical industry than to actually release an engineered bioweapon virus into the wild. And there is no faster way to reduce the world population than to engineer either a vaccine or a weaponized flu virus that burns through the human population, targeting those of an “undesirable” genetic profile who need to be “cleansed” from the human gene pool.

Think about this the next time you think about purchasing Microsoft Office, Windows or some other Microsoft product. By doing so, you are funding what could very well be a global eugenics agenda with the ultimate goal of wiping out a significant proportion of the human race.
« Last Edit: 2014-August-26 12:22:08 AM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
AtlasAikido
AtlasAikido
Sr. Member
***
Posts: 288


« Reply #7 on: 2013-August-21 08:53:16 PM »

Draft please review...  

Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Gates Foundation awards 17 million to inspire supply chain innovation
http://jonrappoportmedia.blogspot.com/2012/08/gates-foundation-awards-17-million-to.html

Saturday, August 18, 2012
Dallas West Nile Virus Spray Operation Aug 2012 Raw Notes
http://jonrappoportmedia.blogspot.com/2012/08/dallas-west-nile-virus-spray-operation.html

Source  with other possible good links: http://jonrappoportmedia.blogspot.com/
Sourced with very interesting links on right side of page: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/
« Last Edit: 2014-August-26 12:24:46 AM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged
AtlasAikido
AtlasAikido
Sr. Member
***
Posts: 288


« Reply #8 on: 2013-October-07 02:05:17 PM »

Putting-Bugs-Before-People-IS-EUGENICS

Understanding Liberals and Progressives
By Walter E. Williams
June 4, 2013
Email  Print
FacebookTwitterShare
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/06/walter-e-williams/putting-bugs-before-people/

In order to understand the liberal and progressive AGENDA, one must know something about THEIR WORLD VISION and VALUES. Let’s examine some of the EVIDENCE.

Why the 1970s struggle to ban DDT? Alexander King, founder of the Malthusian Club of Rome, wrote in a 1990 biographical essay: “My own doubts came when DDT was introduced for civilian use. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria, but at the same time the birth rate had doubled. So my chief quarrel with DDT, in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem.”

  • Dr. Charles Wurster, former chief scientist for the Environmental Defense FUND [EFD], was once asked whether he thought a ban on DDT would result in the use of more dangerous chemicals and more malaria cases in Sri Lanka. He replied: “Probably. So what? People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of them. We [He] need to get rid of some of them, and (malaria) is as GOOD a way as any.”

    According to Earthbound, a collection of essays on environmental ETHICS, William Aiken said: “Massive human diebacks [such as those created by malaria] would be GOOD. It is our [his] duty to cause them. It is our species’ duty, relative to the WHOLE, to eliminate 90 percent of our numbers.”

    Former National Park SERVICE research biologist David Graber opined, “Human happiness, and certainly human fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet [Gaia]. … We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth. … Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us [he] can only hope for the right VIRUS [malaria etc] to come along.”

    Speaking of VIRUSES, Prince Philip – Duke of Edinburgh and patron of the World Wildlife Fund – said, “If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus [such as malaria] to lower human population levels.”

    The late Jacques Cousteau told The UNESCO Courier:“One America burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes. This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.”

That represents the VALUES of some progressives, but what about their PREDICTIONS?

  • In 1972, a report was written for the Club of Rome to warn that the world would run out of gold by 1981, mercury and silver by 1985, tin by 1987, and petroleum, copper, lead and natural gas by 1992. [YET]...THESE RESOURCE ARE MORE PLENTIFUL TODAY.

    Gordon Taylor, in his 1970 book, The Doomsday Book, said that Americans were using 50 percent of the world’s resources and that “by 2000 (Americans) will, if permitted, BE USING ALL OF THE [WORLD'S RESOURCES].”

    In 1975, the Environment Fund took out full-page ads WARNING, “The World AS WE [They] KNOW IT will likely be RUINED by the YEAR 2000.”

    Harvard University NOBEL laureate biologist George Wald in 1970 warned, “CIVILIZATION WILL END WITHIN 15 or 30 years UNLESS immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”

    Former Sen. Gaylord Nelson, quoting Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, WARNED, in Look magazine (1970), THAT BY 1995, “somewhere between 75 and 85 percent of ALL the species of LIVING ANIMALS will be EXTINCT.”

    In 1974, the U.S. Geological Survey said the U.S. had ONLY a 10-year SUPPLY of natural gas. [YET] The fact of the matter, according to the American Gas Association, is that there’s MORE than a 110-YEAR SUPPLY.

    In 1986, Lester Brown, who had been predicting GLOBAL STARVATION for 40 years, received a MacArthur Foundation “GENIUS” AWARD, along with a STIPEND.

    The FOUNDATION also gave Dr. Paul Ehrlich, who predicted millions of Americans would die of starvation, the “GENIUS” award in 1990. Note that these $300,000 to $400,000 AWARDS were granted WELL AFTER enough time had passed to demonstrate that Brown and Ehrlich were INSANELY WRONG.


Just think: Congress [etc etc] listens to people like these [but not others] and formulates public policy on their dire predictions that we’re running out of something.
 
Comment: Regarding the "UNESCO Courier" noted above: Till now I was unaware of Old and "New Eugenics [UNESCO] and the Rise of the Global Scientific Dictatorship" http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-eugenics-and-the-rise-of-the-global-scientific-dictatorship/20028#

And I Found some Useful References
The Population Bomb: Exploding the Myth
Economic Freedom Is the Solution to the Population "Problem"
http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-population-bomb-exploding-the-myth

"Overpopulation: The Perennial Myth The prospect of the Malthusian nightmare is growing steadily more remote".
http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/overpopulation-the-perennial-myth
  
------

On a related note: I found the above article by Walter Williams after web-storming UNESCO after reading the following: 

An article in Java no 217 Oct 2013...noted that 'Will Bruder* a local[Arizona] architect--on a panel with John Meunier* the former dean of ASU's School of Architecture--ended a talk at a night pour (metal) as part of a Soleri remembrance event "by ENCOURAGING THE CROWD [Taliesin students included] to get Cosanti [a windchime foundry] on the HISTORIC REGISTER even asking for *UNESCO* attention. He said integral to saving Cosanti was making sure it was recognized for its true greatness and simply not dismissed as an Arizona oddity"'.

The shocking reality is that such calls to UNESCO (and The World Heritage Fund and Bio Diversity Treaties) are without most of us even being aware of a deadly alliance of authoritarian environmentalists and utopian city planners...

Nightmare in Green: The Authoritarian Environmental Movement Wants to Destroy Industrial Civilization
Ref: http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/nightmare-in-green

Indeed it IS the Statist* who has NOT bothered to think of solutions that do NOT involve enslaving other people. As pointed out in the following article: “…[watch] my fellow humans squirm when asked to think like a free people…” There is *No We*: Challenge the Premise. http://zerogov.com/?p=2334
« Last Edit: 2013-October-09 05:40:28 AM by AtlasAikido » Logged
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: 2014-February-08 03:06:15 PM »

Something REALLY Wicked This Way Comes...
http://tinyurl.com/Really-WICKED
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1656#msg1656

#BillGates #eugenics #psychopath #depopulation #vaccines

Something REALLY Wicked This Way Comes...

As if GOVERNMENT was not threat enough,
NOW comes multi-billionaire Bill Gates playing GOD with human lives...


While reading the following articles, keep in mind that--instead of diabolically KILLING other human beings or UNILATERALLY ruining their reproductive genes, their lives and their futures--the money and effort COULD have been spent on many PRODUCTIVE, USEFUL things. Here are a few that come to my mind:

  • Getting man into space--privately. In space, there is NO "over-population problem"--real or concocted.
  • Funding telomeres research to EXTEND human life, instead of shortening it with eugenics.
  • Curing cancer and other diseases (eliminating malaria HAS ALREADY BEEN DEMONSTRATED using DDT)
  • Electric and hydrogen fueled cars
  • Cheap solar panels for individual homes
  • Low cost energy beamed from satellites
  • Low cost, world wide, wireless energy distribution, such as Tesla demonstrated 100 years ago
  • Low cost, world wide, wireless Wifi internet access
  • Conversion of Uranium power plants to the much safer THORIUM! http://tinyurl.com/THORIUM-energy
  • ...
  • Making MS Windows stable!! Hell, Gates cannot even keep computer viruses out of his own product. Why is he mucking around with real viruses?

What has Bill Gates done instead? Instead of promoting proven DDT solutions, he has funded fake "research" on malaria while racking up recorded deaths of more than 800,000 children per year. And NOW he is going to use the mosquitoes that he has saved from DDT to infect the rest of us with his genetic experiments.

Where have we encountered this kind of grotesque thinking before?

Mild mannered Bill Gates really IS a monster!


Dennis


Bill Gates surprised by Eugenics question. There is much more in this video!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coHf5UEFUl8



http://tinyurl.com/DDT-vs-Malaria
[2007-04-08.2] “DDT Ban & Malaria: An Unnecessary Tragedy, INDEED! -- article by Dennis Wilson
  • An article questioning the wasted and misguided efforts of the (Bill & Melinda) Gates Foundation and the complete blackout of the role of DDT in eradicating malaria in the 1960s.
  • The government ban on DDT has caused MORE HUMAN DEATHS since 1970 than ALL the government wars and genocides since the beginning of the 20th Century--and the deaths still continue EVERY DAY! Malaria kills 800,000 children per year, thanks to Government bans on DDT in the 1970s!

http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1250#msg1250
[2010-10-01] Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population

http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1253#msg1253
[2012-02-02] Microsoft buys eugenics technology from Merck
  • When you buy Microsoft products, you are now promoting the pharmaceutical industry and its global vaccine agenda. That’s the new reality in which we live, where the world’s largest software company is “in bed” with the world’s largest vaccine pusher.

http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1657#msg1657
[2012-07-25] Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide
  • A list of some of the atrocities against humanity Bill Gates has committed in the name of global health.


« Last Edit: 2015-July-23 02:57:05 PM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: 2014-February-08 08:17:31 PM »

Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1657#msg1657


http://worldtruth.tv/bill-gates-genius-or-a-psychopath-you-decide/

Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide

Health, News   July 25, 2012


Bill Gates: Eugenicist Extraordinaire


Bill Gates is the son of William Gates, II who has the head of Planned Parenthood. He comes from a family tradition of elitism where the general population needs to be controlled, curtailed and even extinguished. This son has made his father proud, carrying on the family credo by getting involved with the vaccine industry. Through his financial investments with Monsanto, Gates has been able to make his depopulation desire all the more closer to reality.

Here is a list of some of the atrocities against humanity Bill Gates has committed in the name of global health.

Bill Gates continues to pour millions of dollars into high-risk geoengineering projects that purport to offer a solution to global warming yet have been savaged by environmentalists as potentially posing a greater threat than climate change itself.

In 2009, Microsoft purchased a key piece of technology from the drug company Merck, the world’s largest maker of vaccines. This gene-targeting vaccine research technology is described as a way to “figure out how genes interact with each other, analyze peptides and metabolites, and determine how they relate to gene expression.”

In a keynote address to mHealth Summit in November 2010, Gates told the audience of more than 2,000 at the conference, “About one-third [of that improvement] is by increasing income. The majority has been through vaccines. Vaccines will be the key. If you could register every birth on a cell phone—get fingerprints, get a location—then you could [set up] systems to make sure the immunizations happen.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation poured $23 million into Monsanto shares. Companies like Monsanto are channeled through companies like Blackwater, Total Intelligence Solutions (Monsanto’s intelligence arm) and Terrorism Research Center.

ABC News has been bought through a $1.5 million dollar grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to promote vaccines; GMO food and anythingelse they want the public to have a controlled idea about.

Thanks to a $750 million dollar commitment from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI launched its initiative to vaccinate millions of individuals worldwide. The deadly Garasil vaccine is their prized weapon because of its high mortality rate.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation today announced 78 grants of US$100,000 each in the latest round of Grand Challenges Explorations. Grants include the development of a low-cost cell phone microscope to diagnose malaria, study of the strategic placement of insect-eating plants to reduce insect-borne diseases, and investigation of nanoparticles to release vaccines when they come in contact with human sweat.

Several members of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation management committee, leadership teams, affiliates, and major funders are currently or were previously members of the boards or executive branches of several major drug makers, including Merck and Novartis.

The Gates Foundation holdings are invested in Berkshire Hathaway, which the researchers write has significant ownership in GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Aventis Johnson & Johnson.
The Gates Foundation held stock in Merck at a time when it developed partnerships with the African Comprehensive AIDS and Malaria Partnership and the Merck Company Foundation to test Merck products . . . on unsuspecting Africans.

Gates continues to push vaccines when the pharmaceutical vaccine makers do not speak about the enormous health damage from infant vaccination including autism and numerous neuro-muscular deformities that have been traced back to the toxic adjuvants and preservatives used in most vaccines.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are also financing a project called The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, Syngenta and other major GMO agribusiness giants are reported at the heart of AGRA, using it as a back-door to spread their patented GMO seeds across Africa under the deceptive label, ‘bio-technology,’ a euphemism for genetically engineered patented seeds.

The Gates Foundation, according to their website, wants to vaccinate the entire world population, despite medical evidence that vaccinations are deadly.
The World Health Organization, one of GAVI’s partners, teamed up with the World Bank and UN Population Fund in the 1970′s under the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation”. The Task Force, “…acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D.” GAVI is heavily funded by the Bill & Melinda gates Foundation for the global vaccination projects.

One of the programs funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a sterilization program that would use sharp blasts of ultrasound directed against a man’s scrotum to render him infertile for six months. It might accurately be called a “temporary castration” technology.

When a billionaire like Bill Gates suddenly becomes entranced by vaccines as philanthropy the world should take notice. Studies have come out refuting the necessity of these vaccines as a risk to public health, yet Gates continues on. In an answer to the alternative media’s exposure to his death peddling, Gates has bought ABC News as an attempt to gain back his influence on the public. All the power grabbing and manipulation of the media does not change the fact that the world is waking up to the dangers of vaccines, refusing to have them or give them to their children.

Third world countries are in a less advantageous stance to refuse these poisons. This is a grave injustice being forced onto these people. Where medical care should be helping, it is only contributing to the mounting death toll thanks to Bill Gates.


Bill Gates funds scheme to spray artificial ‘planet-cooling’ sulfur particles into atmosphere

Geo-engineers are finally coming out of the “chemtrail” closet, as reports are now emerging about deliberate plans in the works to dump untold tons of sulfate chemicals into the atmosphere for the purported purpose of fighting so-called “global warming.”

The U.K.’s Guardian and others are reporting that a multi-million dollar research fund, which just so happens to have been started and funded by Microsoft founder and vaccine enthusiast Bill Gates, is being used to fund the project. A large balloon hovering at 80,000 feet over Fort Sumner, New Mexico, will release the sulfates into the atmosphere within the next year.

The stated purpose for this massive release of toxic sulfate particles is that doing so will allegedly reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere, and thus cool the planet. But many environmental groups and advocates of common sense are decrying the idea as dangerous, and one that could result in permanent damage to ecosystems all across the globe.

“Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone layer, and disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, potentially threatening the food supplies of billions of people,” said Pat Mooney, Executive Director of the ETC Group, a Canadian environmental protection group.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2UhS4k5FhE


“It will do nothing to decrease levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or halt ocean acidification. And solar geo-engineering is likely to increase the risk of climate-related international conflict, given that the modeling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global south.”

But the Gates-backed cohort is persistent in its efforts to geo-graffiti the world, as its scientists insist that governments are not doing enough to fight back against the supposed environment impacts of global warming. If governments refuse to implement high enough carbon taxes to eliminate greenhouse gases, in other words, then Gates and Co. believes it has no choice but to “save the planet” by polluting it with sulfate particles.


Bill Gates on energy: Innovating to zero or it is depopulation to zero !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaF-fq2Zn7I


Spraying the skies with sulfate particles will destroy the planet faster than ‘global warming’ ever could

Sulfate particles are toxic, though, and constitute the very same type of ambient particulate matter (PM) that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers to be a noxious air pollutant. Deliberately spraying the skies with tiny particles composed of any material, for that matter, is hazardous both to respiratory health in humans and animals, as well as to water sources, soils, and other delicate environmental resources.

“Sulfate particles from acid rain can cause harm to the health of marine life in the rivers and lakes it contaminates, and can result in mortality,” says an online water pollution guide (http://www.water-pollution.org.uk/health.html). A University of Washington (UW) report also explains that sulfate particles “contribute to acid rain, cause lung irritation, and have been a main culprit in causing the haze that obscures a clear view of the Grand Canyon.”

Blocking the sun with reflective particles will also deprive humans of natural sunlight exposure, which is a primary source for naturally generating health-promoting vitamin D in the body. So once again, Bill Gates is at the helms of a project that seeks to control the climate in artificial ways using toxic chemicals, an endeavor that is sure to create all sorts of potentially irreversible problems for humanity and the planet.



Experts call WHO & Bill Gates Foundation’s role in India’s polio eradication campaign unethical
Rise in paralysis cases after polio vaccine

Cases of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis, better known as AFP, has sharply increased with the increase in the administration of oral polio vaccination (OPV) in the country under the much-acclaimed polio eradication programme.

Experts call WHO & Bill Gates Foundation’s role in India’s polio eradication campaign unethical. Medical experts in paediatrics in the country have lambasted the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Bill Gates Foundation for trumpeting India’s polio eradication campaign which they knew 10 years back that it was never going to succeed. ‘India was taken off the list of polio-endemic countries by the WHO on January 12, 2012 but the polio eradication campaign will have to be continued in some format forever. The long promised monetary benefits from ceasing to vaccinate against poliovirus will never be achieved’, the well known paediatricians said.“It was unethical for WHO and Bill Gates to flog this programme when they knew 10 years back that it was never to succeed. Getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical,” said Dr Neetu Vashisht and Dr Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Paediatrics at St Stephens Hospital in Delhi in their report in the April issue of ‘Indian Journal of Medical Ethics’. Rise in paralysis cases after polio vaccineCases of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis, better known as AFP, has sharply increased with the increase in the administration of oral polio vaccination (OPV) in the country under the much-acclaimed polio eradication programme.

According to a report by Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel, appearing in the April-June issue of the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, the incidence of non-polio AFP had gone up by 12 times over and above the normal rates with the onset of the administration OPV 10 years ago. The report appeared at a time when Kerala is getting prepared for another round of OPV on April 15.

Dr. Jacob, also a member of the national technical advisory group on immunisation and of the working group on food and drug regulation in the 12th Five Year Plan, told DC on Friday that there was a definite co-relation between the increase in the number AFP and the irrational administration of OPV.

Normally, he said, the chances of children under the age of 15 getting affected by non-polio AFP are 1-2 per 100,000. But, the rate of non-polio AFP nationally “is now 12 times higher than expected.” In 2011, an additional 47,500 children were newly paralyzed, over and above the standard rate of 2 children per 100,000 non-polio AFP cases, says the paper in the journal.

Dr. Jacob said the increase in the occurrence of non-polio AFP could be directly linked to the massive increase in the dosage of OPV in the name of eradication. Although, the increase in the non-polio AFP was known for quite some time, it was for the first time that a co-relation was established by collating the data of the national polio surveillance, he said.


http://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels/cities/thiruvananthapuram/rise-paralysis-cases-after-polio-vaccine-234

Flip side of India’s polio success story

Surveillance data show that last year, seven children in India developed polio from vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV), the medical term for a virus from the oral polio vaccine (OPV) that has regained the ability to cause disease.

Such infections occur when virus from the OPV, after being excreted by vaccinated children, regains neuro-virulence and the ability to circulate in the environment and strikes other vulnerable children.

Public health experts also estimate that between 100 and 180 children in India develop vaccine-associated polio paralysis (VAPP) each year, a rare but serious side effect of the OPV they had received to protect them from the wild poliovirus. As opposed to VDPV infection, VAPP affects the vaccinated children themselves.


Sources for this article include:

www.guardian.co.uk

www.naturalnews.com

.

Disclaimer: All information, data and material contained, presented, or provided on WorldTruth.Tv is for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. Decisions you make about your family's healthcare are important and should be made in consultation with a competent medical professional. We are not physicians and do not claim to be. Any views expressed here-in are not necessarily those held by WorldTruth.Tv
« Last Edit: 2015-July-23 02:22:44 PM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: 2014-September-21 03:03:06 PM »

[2014-09-20] “ Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset”
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1717#msg1717


http://www.zengardner.com/eugenics-psychopathic-depopulation-sanctified/

Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset

    Eugenics
    Social Engineering

by Zen Gardner - Sep 20, 2014
13 128

by Zen Gardner

Let’s suppose the elitist scum working to ruin and control our lives and planet are in some fashion real people to some extent. I know, a stretch, but let’s try.  So how can they perpetrate such horrors on humanity? How could such madness be justified in the minds of men, however psychopathic?

Actually, it’s easy. For self promotion, preservation and power they’ve convinced themselves that what they are perpetrating is the right thing to do. But what’s their fundamental tenet for mass murder?

Everything they think and believe is a fabricated bastardization and reversal of any real Truth, but in their minds they’ve decided this wicked, inhuman illuminist takeover makes sense. Especially with their fat cheeks being firmly ensconced in the seats of power.

Oh, the vestiges of their human conscience may give some of them a nudge in some cases, but it’s been shut down almost completely for most of them. It has to be. You can’t have empathy and wreak such death dealing havoc on nature and humanity.

If you’ve ever known or observed a pathological liar, this cauterized mindset is their way of life. Politicians do it without the slightest compunction. To them it’s part of the job description for ruling the unwashed masses. How is it justified logically? The old “necessary evil” ruse, as in the justification for 9/11 and myriad of other actions.

The even more amazing thing is that they smugly revel in this ugliness, thinking they’re the “good guys”.
Convincing the Cattle to Die – Eugenics Justifies All

Think about it. What a slam dunk for world domination to so twist perception to where humanity is the problem that needs to be curtailed by draconian controls while being systematically exterminated like a pest infestation.  Be it engineered wars, poverty and food shortages; drugging, corrupted food, and water; dumbed down information and media, or injecting toxins in our bodies, all is fair game to them.

Eugenics is the “tie that binds”, the glue that holds all the other lies conveniently together. And it takes the sting out of outright mass murder. For them. It’s a “cleaning” and “preparation” for their desired world to come.

Look what Agenda 21 controls are perpetrated via things like climate change and CO2 fabrications. Sure, we’re in the throes of massive climate extremes for many reasons, many of them geoengineered, but to blame it on cattle flatulence and human breathing must be some kind of macabre inside joke. Bottom line is they are planning a great “culling of the herd” and need our permission. We’ve read about it for decades in their elitist writings, and this is how they justify it and hope to convince us as much as possible of the same. That’s the alert.

Remember, not waking up and saying no is ultimately humanity’s imprimatur that it agrees. That’s where empowerment comes in. We can say no and reverse all this, just as we’ve done in many instances. But the awakened shout out needs to be immediate and insistent.

eugenicstree
A Little Background

As eugenics, called the “self-direction of human evolution”, grew out of its inception in the 1800’s, it was considered the harmonious result of all branches of science. The US was the first to implement eugenics programs as early as 1908 and it gained a lot of popularity and traction. What stopped it in its tracks, at least in public opinion, was the Nazi implementation of eugenics during WW2 to the obvious horror of all, however backed by the American program and exaggerated by Zionists.

This would later turn out to be an amazingly cunning pre-planned propaganda tool as we’ll discuss below.

But now look how this eugenics campaign has been revived and is currently perpetrated. With innocuous sounding names like Planned Parenthood to the UN’s dastardly Agenda 21, the mass hive mind sees these measures as “progress” while knowing little to nothing about the extensive anti-human nevermind anti-freedom measures being foisted upon them.

And it’s not just genetic culling, it’s mass population reduction.

An elitist think tank called The Club of Rome set the latest stage for this last push to demonize humanity with the contrived invention of militant, invasive environmentalism. This appeared around the same time as the widely sensationalized “population bomb” concept. While real ecology and conservationism make common sense, this environmental agenda was created with the specific intention to foist massive controls over human activities. That we’re now at the incredulous point of having to pay a literal carbon tax is a total giveaway of their fraudulent intentions.

Yet few catch on.

And again, like the lie of human caused global warming, we should feel guilty for being alive, to such an extent that even our breath is supposedly killing the planet.

Insane. Yet they keep pushing their agenda regardless of real scientific data to the contrary.

Bill Gates Vaccines
The Cauterized Mind of Dystopians

While humanity doesn’t share the bestial mindset of the elites and their occult driven agenda, these pounding programs wear on people. Over time the continued onslaught of these nonsensical anti-truths start to wear a groove in the mass mind.

The psycho-trauma tool of choice? Cognitive dissonance.

Resistance subsides as seemingly contrary understandings–in this case, “I’m a sovereign human being who deserves life and freedom” vs. “I’m a parasitic organism killing my host planet and need to be eradicated”.  Screwy, but that’s what it boils down to.

And what gets synthesized in the mind to reconcile the two? “I guess they know what they’re doing. Gee, we are bad and something needs to be done.” It doesn’t really make sense so the overload causes a shutdown and back to the TV and ball game they go, acquiescing by apathy.

Once again, the intended solution being foisted on society gains traction.

And daring to oppose this new status-quo? It has now been cleverly engineered to be tantamount to terrorism, the ultimate behavioral catch-all.

Game. Set. Match…or so they think.

stealing-of-palestinian-land-by-israel-with-the-help-of-the-west
Zio-Kabbalism  – An Identifiable Virus Form

While the arrogant, intellectual roots of modern eugenics seem to escape mainstream consciousness, obvious forms of racism and genocidal extermination, as recently exposed in the latest Gaza genocide, have been much more evident. That the two are intrinsically connected takes one to the much deeper understanding of what’s really going on on this planet – the elimination of more conscious and rooted indigenous forms of humanity and the subjugation of the remaining human race and its ultimate manipulation into a non-questioning subservient form actually loving its enslavement.

Yes, just like the predictive programming evidenced in literature and film making for centuries.

The Zionist mindset with its Kabbalistic occult sense of supremacism is a clear example of justified extermination of “lesser” beings. An incredible “in your face” example that the world turns a blind eye to. Instead, they fall for the big lie created by the engineered German holocaust that the perpetrators of this current extermination of their “inferiors” as manifested in the millions of killed and displaced Palestinians, is somehow because the killers are the potential victims.

That’s how they work. Manipulate history and pound the manipulated message home via propaganda. That simple – as long as you have a complicit media and engorging codependent governments. Behold the birth of the Zionist parasite called Israel. A perfect example of the sick fruits of eugenically driven, ravenous psychotic behavior,

When people wake up to that mechanism blood will run hot and heavy and they’ll get their due. They always have and always will.

Evil dies from its own corrupted aberration.  As in the human body, the protective immune system of the Universe will eventually disable and recycle these invaders.

01gleaqaci
The Interdimensional Connection

In a Universe of boundless life and energy we know entities of all types exist, which even so-called modern scientists affirm. Dimensions abound beyond ours and they’re here and interacting with our world.

This reality must play heavily into our personal understanding of our interdimensional cosmos. We’re a world under siege, and we need to know our enemies as well as our friends.  That such forces of darkness can mount such a profoundly coordinated attack on a planet of mainly meek, loving inhabitants reeks of opportunity for an aggressive force. I don’t know exactly what’s going on but I hope this helps present the case for what we’re potentially up against.

Inter-dimensional war.

I would be remiss without pointing out these otherworldly influences on our three dimensional experience. There is much more than meets the physical eye as we well know. People are driven by many influences, and spiritual ones are the most profound. Religions dutifully categorize such concepts as good and bad influences, while metaphysics dissects these various aspects with intrigue. Psychic, transcendental and after death phenomena also abound.

So please don’t tell me there’s nothing more than this observable world.

loveunitydance01
The Antidote – Disengage and Live in Truth and Love

Never give in mentally or spiritually to this onslaught. While we need to stay active in exposing their perfidy, we cannot be part of their ensnaring mindset.

That’s why turning off all forms of mainstream media is so important. That’s why immersion in positive influences, nature, and loving people to counter these types of realities is so important.

Anyone in their right mind knows this kind of plan cannot succeed in the long run. We happen to be at a time in history where these negative, barbaric influences are peaking with the acceleration of hijacked technologies.

This too shall pass. But we should be vigilant and prepare as best we can, without fear. It’s a time to grow in consciousness and communication with each other so we can share our combined knowledge, insights and loving support.

Therein is life, one day at a time. As it always is.

Much love, Zen

ZenGardner.com
« Last Edit: 2015-November-02 01:49:55 PM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
DennisLeeWilson
Creator of this site
Administrator
Forum/Blog Owner
*****
Posts: 1331


Existence exists & Man's mind can know it.


WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: 2015-November-02 02:41:28 PM »

Links to this page:
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1821#msg1821

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/11/bill-gates-at-60-an-alternative-retrospective.html


Bill Gates at 60: An Alternative Retrospective
TOPICS:Bill GateseugenicsHeather CallaghanVaccines

November 2, 2015

By Heather Callaghan

On October 28th, 2015 Bill Gates turned 60 years old. As one might suspect, the mainstream media has been filled with tributes and retrospectives of his life and career. These tributes of course center around Gates’ alleged revolutionary developments in technology and his “philanthropic efforts” across the globe.

Articles such as “Bill Gates at 60: His ten defining moments” and “As Bill Gates Turns 60: A Look at 10 Key Years,” such tributes are boiled down to what amounts to Bill’s 10 greatest hits. These milestones mentioned by the two articles above and the slew of other articles in the same vein focus on the creation of Microsoft, his infamous “mugshot” moment and a number of opportunistic deals clinched by Gates over the years.

However, in honor of Mr. Gates, it is important to also provide a list of his “deep tracks” that were not so heavily covered in the mainstream media. Below are just a few.

1.) Bill Gates Backs and Promotes Temporary Sterilization Microchip In Women

Living up to the family tradition of promoting sterilization and the legacy of Planned Parenthood, Gates launched an ambitious plan to push the development of microchips which would “temporarily” sterilize women.

The same developers who are bringing wireless remote-controlled microchip implants are actually focusing on their first flagship product: Gates Foundation-funded birth-control microchip implants. Wireless technology allows the remote-controlled chip to turn a woman’s ability to conceive off or on at will – temporary sterilization. Of course with remote technology funded by eugenics depopulation fanatics, the first questions should always be, “the ability to conceive by whose will?” This would be the complete antithesis of female empowerment or a “woman’s right to choose” – would it not?

The encryption is alleged to be so safe, that cyberhackers cannot break entry – that means you too.

The chip can be implanted into the hip, arms or beneath the back. Mum was the word during the last few years of development until it was finally publicly confirmed that the beta testing for the birth control chip would be starting towards the end of this year.

Indeed, keeping in line with the eugenics fanaticism, Gates will be targeting women in third world countries like India and Africa to test the chip on them before introducing it to the greater commercial market.

2.) Gates Wages War on Traditional Medicine in India

When it comes to forceful health initiatives, especially those sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – India is the new Africa. Yet another Gates-funded initiative seeks to use influence, ferret out true believer health officials, leverage their influence for social manipulation, paint the culture as uneducated and convince them to “get with the Western health program.”

An ongoing study of cultural behavior is described in the paper “Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale” in the September 15, 2014  issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The idea is to pair social networks with social motives to “close the science gap.” In other words, to put authoritative findings into direct action and overcome cultural caution. It is essentially a wide-reaching and deep-acting propaganda system to heavily influence neonatal care in India.

The example used in the study focuses on convincing Indian mothers that applying a topical solution of chlorhexidine to cleanse a newborn’s umbilical cord reduced the neonatal mortality rate by 24 percent, but to the chagrin of Gates-backed researchers, many Indian parents did not receive or follow this information. They stuck to their method of mustard oil – a powerful Ayurveda solution that is becoming more popular in the U.S. for its stimulation of the circulation system.

This observation of human beings as though they are lab rats, and the effort of trying to break them of their culture, talks about using tactics of “knowledge management” and using “influencers” to get people to change. Such tactics border on brainwashing techniques used by Chinese captors on American soldiers. See for yourself the kind of degrading language the researchers use toward the “superstitious” Indians.

3.) Bill Gates Says Global Vaccination Program is “God’s Work”

Gates clearly thinks highly of his work, particular in the global vaccination push department. Brandon Turbeville writes,

    In a recent interview with the London Telegraph, Bill Gates has now claimed that his Foundation’s massive push for vaccination is not just an exercise in philanthropy but that it is, in fact, “God’s work.”

    Gates, who, according to the Telegraph, is worth an estimated $65 billion, is now dedicating his life to the “eradication of poliomyelitis,” or, at least he is dedicating himself to the vaccination program allegedly aimed at achieving these ends.

    As reported by the Telegraph,

    “My wife and I had a long dialogue about how we were going to take the wealth that we’re lucky enough to have and give it back in a way that’s most impactful to the world,” he says. “Both of us worked at Microsoft and saw that if you take innovation and smart people, the ability to measure what’s working, that you can pull together some pretty dramatic things.

    “We’re focused on the help of the poorest in the world, which really drives you into vaccination. You can actually take a disease and get rid of it altogether, like we are doing with polio.”

4.) Bill Gates Promotes Malaria Vaccine Flop

Not all of Bill Gates’ vaccine campaigns have been public relations successes, however. For instance, as Turbeville writes,

    In what may prove to be a minor public relations setback for vaccine pushers like Bill Gates and GlaxoSmithKline, the much touted Mosquirix malaria vaccine recently rolled out in Africa has been officially demonstrated to be only 30% effective in babies.Results from the final-stage trial administered by GSK appeared to demonstrate that the vaccine only provided “modest protection” for babies aged six to 12 weeks, with a reduction in the contraction of the disease by only 30%, a much lower number than what had been touted by those promoting the jab in the industry and the corporate media.

    Reuters also reports that for children after the age of six months, a 65% rate was established. For children of five to 17 months old, the researchers claim a protection of around 50%.

    In response to what Reuters has dubbed a “surprisingly poor result” for the vaccine, Bill Gates stated, “The efficacy came back lower than we had hoped, but developing a vaccine against a parasite is a very hard thing to do.”Indeed, Gates is correct in suggesting the difficulty for creating a vaccine for a Protozoan, the type of parasite which causes malaria, This is because vaccines are supposedly designed to protect against viruses. Thus, the Mosquirix vaccine enters into the growing science of DNA vaccines – a research field which is expanding but also one in which the science is still very much out in regards to effectiveness, safety, and even possibility.

    You can’t handle the truth about vaccines (Ad)

    Nevertheless, GSK has announced that it will not be giving up in the attempt to develop Mosquirix into a more “effective” vaccine, and will be working with governments and international groups in order to fund the operation. GSK claims it does not plan to make a profit from Mosquirix, although it admits that it will be charging a 5% profit margin on the product. The funding for the development and rollout, of course, will be coming from the governments and international groups mentioned above, meaning it is the cash-strapped taxpayer who must shovel out the cash for yet another eugenics program aimed at poor Africans.

5.) Bill Gates Promotes Cashless Society

Turbeville has documented Bill Gates’ vaccine exploits on a number of different occasions. Yet he has also brought to light a number of questionable campaigns promoted by Gates that are not related to vaccines at all. Such as Gates’ connection to The Better Than Cash Alliance and the push for a cashless society.

Turbeville writes in his article “Better Than Cash Alliance Backed by Bill Gates to Usher in Cashless Society“:

    It appears that while Bill Gates was content to play the role of Microsoft innovator and billionaire philanthropist early on, he has decided that the second half of his life deserves a more open and slightly more honest twist.

    Indeed, in recent years Bill Gates and his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have funded a variety of initiatives aimed at reducing population, promoting toxic vaccinations, and now hyping and funding the development of the cashless society.

    In a recent article by Peter McCoy published in Bloomberg Businessweek, McCoy reveals that Bill Gates is opposed to physical cash currency because, like vaccine-free populations who are able to determine their own reproduction rates, it hurts poor people (according to Gates).

    Indeed, McCoy writes that Gates “hates cash” “because of its effect on people at the opposite end of the wealth spectrum—the world’s poor and unbanked.” Of course, in third world countries that are suffering from starvation, civil war, and abysmal living standards, the answer is clearly “banking.”

    If only these nations had more banks and greater access to banks – the private banks of course – then we would finally see the living standards of these nations raised to truly acceptable levels. If only more people had access to digital transactions, then empty bellies would soon be filled.

    Sarcasm aside, the push toward a cashless society under the guise of benefiting the poor and underserved is a very real movement. As McCoy points out in his article, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been instrumental in this regard as major backers of the Better Than Cash Alliance – an organization that was established last September whose stated objectives are to reach the following goals by 2017:

        Significant commitments by governments, the development community, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector to implement electronic payment solutions instead of cash.
        Delivery of demand-driven technical assistance to governments, non-governmental organizations, the development community, or members of the private sector that will dramatically increase the capacity of these stakeholders to deliver end-user-focused payment technologies.
        Improved economic security for millions of low-income and poor people, many of whom were previously unbanked, enabling them to use bank or electronic accounts to build savings and assets via innovative payment technologies.

    The Better Than Cash Alliance founding members and financiers boasts of a list of organizations that have their own sordid histories from the distant past all the way back to present times. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which is instrumental in population reduction initiatives via vaccination programs, abortion and sterilization, and other programs; Citi, the major international bank who wasintricately involved in the 2008 derivatives crisis; the Ford Foundation, representatives of which actually stated to Reece Commission Chief Investigator Norman Dodd that the goal of the foundation was to comfortably merge the United States with the Soviet Union; Omidyar Network; and VISA Inc. which has long been interested in creating a cashless society.

    Yet the Better Than Cash Alliance has more than just corporate and private sector sponsors as one of the key founding members and financiers is, in fact, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), a “government” agency that answers directly to the U.S. Secretary of State. It has been understood for some time that USAID is nothing more than CIA front operation for intelligence gathering and as a facilitation mechanism for the CIA funding of foreign governments andorganizations.

    In addition, the Better Than Cash Alliance founder and financier roster contains the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), the UN’s “capital investment agency” reserved for use with the “least developed” nations.
    Easiest way to get your first bitcoin (Ad)

    The Better Than Cash Alliance also boasts of participation by the World Food Programme, Mercy Corps, Concern Worldwide, and CARE. The governments listed as taking part in the alliance are the governments of Afghanistan, Department of Social Prosperity of the Government of Colombia,Republic of Kenya, Republic of Peru, and Republic of the Philippines.

    Yet, even without the establishment of the Better Than Cash Alliance or the recent comments by Bill Gates, it is very clear that the world is moving in the direction of an entirely cashless society.

6.) Bill Gates Accidentally Blows the Lid on Vaccine Scam

Two sentences which Bill Gates will eternally regret uttering are “The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

7.) The Bill Gates Polio Vaccine Failure

As Turbeville writes in his article, “Bill Gates Says Global Vaccination Program is God’s Work,”

    Even more concerning is the fact that paralysis rates have flourished in countries where Gates’ polio vaccine, the one he is dedicating his life to, have been administered the most. Indeed, nowhere is this any more apparent than in India. As Aaron Dykes writes,

    But the real story is that while polio has statistically disappeared from India, there has been a huge spike in cases of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP)– the very types of crippling problems it was hoped would disappear with polio but which have instead flourished from a new cause.

    There were 47,500 cases of non-polio paralysis reported in 2011, the same year India was declared “polio-free,” according to Dr. Vashisht and Dr. Puliyel. Further, the available data shows that the incidents tracked back to areas were doses of the polio vaccine were frequently administered. The national rate of NPAFP in India is 25-35 times the international average.

In addition to this data, it appears that the polio vaccines are themselves the leading cause of polio paralysis in India. In relation to the flawed data reported by the Polio Global Eradication Initiative which attempts to minimize the numbers of both vaccine-induced cases of polio paralysis and polio in general, Sayer Ji remarks,

    According to the Polio Global Eradication Initiative’s own statistics there were 42 cases of wild-type polio (WPV) reported in India in 2010, indicating that vaccine-induced cases of polio paralysis (100-180 annually) outnumber wild-type cases by a factor of 3-4. Even if we put aside the important question of whether or not the PGEI is accurately differentiating between wild and vaccine-associated polio cases in their statistics, we still must ask ourselves: should not the real-world effects of immunization, both good and bad, be included in PGEI’s measurement of success? For the dozens of Indian children who develop vaccine-induced paralysis every year, the PGEI’s recent declaration of India as nearing “polio free” status, is not only disingenuous, but could be considered an attempt to minimize their obvious liability in having transformed polio from a natural disease vector into a man-made (iatrogenic) one.

Gates’ polio vaccines have likewise been blamed for deaths and disabilities in neighboring Pakistan, with offices of the government in that country even recommending that the vaccines be suspended.

In India, doctors heavily criticized the program not only for the heavy cost to human health and quality of life but also the massive financial burden hoisted upon the state. This is because the program was only partially funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations, which is itself partnered with the World Health Organization, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, World Bank, and United Nations.

The doctors criticized the GAVI-alliance by stating,

    The Indian government finally had to fund this hugely expensive programme, which cost the country 100 times more than the value of the initial grant,” their report stated.

    From India’s perspective the exercise has been an extremely costly both in terms of human suffering and in monetary terms. It is tempting to speculate what could have been achieved if the $2.5 billion spent on attempting to eradicate polio, were spent on water and sanitation and routine immunization.

    . . . . . the polio eradication programme epitomizes nearly everything that is wrong with donor funded ‘disease specific’ vertical projects at the cost of investments in community-oriented primary health care (horizontal programmes) . . . . .

    . . . . .This is a startling reminder of how initial funding and grants from abroad distort local priorities.

Indeed, as the doctors assert, one cannot vaccinate away disease like polio. Apart from the fact that there has never been a study conducted which proves a vaccine either safe or effective that was not connected to a drug company or a vaccine maker,[1] the so-called cure, if it comes under the guise of a vaccine, may well be as bad if not worse than the disease itself.

Again, Sayer Ji writes,

    Polio underscores the need for a change in the way we look at so-called “vaccine preventable” diseases as a whole. In most people with a healthy immune system, a poliovirus infection does not even generate symptoms. Only rarely does the infection produce minor symptoms, e.g. sore throat, fever, gastrointestinal disturbances, and influenza-like illness. In only 3% of infections does virus gain entry to the central nervous system, and then, in only 1-5 in 1000 cases does the infection progress to paralytic disease.

    Due to the fact that polio spreads through the fecal-oral route (i.e. the virus is transmitted from the stool of an infected person to the mouth of another person through a contaminated object, e.g. utensil) focusing on hygiene, sanitation and proper nutrition (to support innate immunity) is a logical way to prevent transmission in the first place, as well as reducing morbidity associated with an infection when it does occur.

    Instead, a large portion of the world’s vaccines are given to the Third World as “charity,” when the underlying conditions of economic impoverishment, poor nutrition, chemical exposures, and socio-political unrest are never addressed.

The fact is that the root cause of diseases like polio are not a lack of vaccination but poor sanitation standards, poverty, lower living standards, chemical pollution, and lack of proper nutrition. If money were spent correcting these ills, as opposed to providing ineffective (in their stated purposes) and dangerous vaccinations, then polio and many other such diseases could indeed be eradicated.

In the end, the answer is about raising living standards, reducing pollution, increasing knowledge and access to proper nutrition and clean drinking water – not chemical and virus-laden needles. Perhaps this method could be more accurately described as “God’s work.”

8,) Bill Gates Searching for a Super Condom

Okay, so this one is just more funny than anything else. In 2013, Bill Gates announced a $100,000 reward offered by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation via The Grand Challenges and Global Health program to anyone who would be able to create a condom that would be easier to wear, more cleverly packaged or one that would be able to overcome “cultural differences.” It’s hard to argue against the creation of a better prophylactic, but considering Gates’ history we know that he is focused on more than preventing births than protecting sexually active adults from diseases.

9.) Bill Gates Buys Stock in Monsanto

In 2010, it was revealed that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was joining with notorious big agri companies Monsanto and Cargill for the purposes of promoting genetically modified foods in Africa. Gates has long supported GMOs across the world but in 2010, his direct connection to their production and promotion with the Foundation’s purchase of 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock. With Cargill, the foundation teamed up for a $10 million dollar project to quote “develop the soya value chain” in Mozambique and in other countries.
 
10.) Bill Gates Wants You to Drink Recycled Toilet-Poop Water

For this one, the title is certainly funny, but the goal is not. Earlier this year, Bill Gates via the Gates Foundation launched yet another “philanthropic” program to bring clean water to the hundreds of millions of people who live without it. His idea was the Omniprocessor – a giant machine that can turn human waste into clean drinking water in minutes. Of course, many might wonder why Gates did not promote a giant machine that simply treated the water that was there or developed a relatively simple concept into a technology that removed salt from water in the coastal areas. After all, sea levels are rising, right? Instead, Gates’ development focuses on producing clean drinking water through feces and urine. Is it impressive science? Sure. But it’s also a colossal waste of time and money considering the large number of other simpler and more affordable options available. This writer sincerely wishes that people would see beyond the science-gleam and discern what this action means symbolically toward you, the reader. This writer holds the readers in the highest esteem and wants them to as well – the world deserves much better than the psychopathic and depopulation actions of Bill Gates et al.

Also See:
Bill Gates Says Life Would Be Better With A World Government
Why Are Bill Gates And Monsanto Funding A “Doomsday” Seed Vault?
Eugenicist Bill Gates Funds Gene Tweaking Company

Image by Heather Callaghan. The author wishes to thank Brandon Turbeville.

Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com and ActivistPost.com. Like at Facebook.

1.) Bill Gates Backs and Promotes Temporary Sterilization Microchip In Women

2.) Gates Wages War on Traditional Medicine in India.

3.) Bill Gates Says Global Vaccination Program is “God’s Work”

4.) Bill Gates Promotes Malaria Vaccine Flop

5.) Bill Gates Promotes Cashless Society

6.) Bill Gates Accidentally Blows the Lid on Vaccine Scam

7.) The Bill Gates Polio Vaccine Failure

8.) Bill Gates Searching for a Super Condom

9.) Bill Gates Buys Stock in Monsanto
 
10.) Bill Gates Wants You to Drink Recycled Toilet-Poop Water
« Last Edit: 2015-November-02 02:58:33 PM by DennisLeeWilson » Logged

Objectivist & Sovereign Individual
Creator of Atlas Shrugged Celebration Day & Artemis Zuna Trading Post
Signatory: Covenant of Unanimous Consent
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!